What is the standard of review for violations of the right to interpreter?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rodriguez, 232 Cal.Rptr. 132, 42 Cal.3d 1005, 728 P.2d 202 (Cal. 1986):
We turn first to the appropriate standard of review for violations of the right to an interpreter. (Cal. Const., art. I, 14.) 1 We considered this right in People v. Aguilar (1984) 35 Cal.3d 785, 200 Cal.Rptr. 908, 677 P.2d 1198, but did not there adopt a particular standard.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When reviewing a claim of a violation of the constitutional right to confront, does the court apply the de novo standard of review? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a claim that the Miranda rights were violated, how have courts reviewed the evidence in the context of Miranda rights claims? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a decision of an administrative agency not involving a fundamental right, what is the standard of review? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a section 654 challenge, what standard of review does the court apply in reviewing the challenge? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a claim alleging violation of the right to compulsory process? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for reviewing a defendant's claim that their statements were elicited in violation of Miranda? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a defendant's state constitutional right to an impartial jury was violated by an excusal for cause? (California, United States of America)
Does the standard instruction on motive violate a defendant's constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
What is the applicable standard of review for an application of the independent review test? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure of instruction to require a jury to produce written findings by the jury regarding the aggravating factors found and considered in returning a death sentence violate a defendant's constitutional right to meaningful appellate review? (California, United States of America)
