What is the standard for reviewing a defendant's claim that their statements were elicited in violation of Miranda?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Cunningham, 108 Cal.Rptr.2d 291, 25 Cal.4th 926, 25 P.3d 519 (Cal. 2001):
Following the adoption of article I, section 28, subdivision (d) of the California Constitution, we have applied federal standards in reviewing a defendant's claim that his or her statements were elicited in violation of Miranda. (People v. Sims, supra, 5 Cal.4th 405, 440, 20 Cal.Rptr.2d 537, 853 P.2d 992.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When reviewing the voluntariness of a defendant's statements, or of improper police conduct, is the Miranda waiver violation or Miranda waiver violated? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a claim that the Miranda rights were violated, how have courts reviewed the evidence in the context of Miranda rights claims? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's statements were elicited from him in violation of the Miranda code? (California, United States of America)
What is the scope of review for a claim that a statement was inadmissible at trial because it was obtained in violation of the Miranda rights? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a trial court's decision on the Miranda issue, does the court have to agree that a statement was obtained in violation of the Miranda Act? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a claim of a violation of the constitutional right to confront, does the court apply the de novo standard of review? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant's statements elicited in violation of the Miranda code be used at trial to rebut a sanity defense? (California, United States of America)
Is counsel incompetent in denying a defendant's motion to exclude his statements to the police in violation of Miranda v. Miranda? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant's statements were elicited in violation of the Miranda Act? (California, United States of America)
