What is the standard of review for improper admission in an administrative hearing?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Kang v. City of L. A., B264346 (Cal. App. 2016):
On appeal from a judgment denying a writ of mandate involving a challenge to evidentiary rulings in an administrative hearing, we apply an abuse-of-discretion standard of review. (Miyamoto v. Department of Motor Vehicles (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 1210, 1217.) Further, the improper admission or
Page 24
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
On appeal, can the court conduct an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing and the records reviewed by the trial court to determine whether any records were improperly withheld? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for appellate review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review used by the courts in reviewing the administrative record? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a section 654 challenge, what standard of review does the court apply in reviewing the challenge? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a decision of an administrative agency not involving a fundamental right, what is the standard of review? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review under federal law for a hearing for abuse of power? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in a motion seeking to overturn a decision made by the Court of Appeal in the absence of a hearing? (California, United States of America)
Is an improper statement in a jury trial admissible to show the effect on the jurors' mental processes of other, improper statements? (California, United States of America)
What is the applicable standard of review for an application of the independent review test? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant's request for reappointment of counsel for a preliminary hearing was rejected immediately before the preliminary hearing commenced, is such error harmless even under the beyond-the-reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
