What is the standard of review for home relief and Supplemental Security Income claims?
"New York", United States of America
The following excerpt is from Lee v. Smith, 373 N.E.2d 247, 402 N.Y.S.2d 351, 43 N.Y.2d 453 (N.Y. 1977):
The standard of review of petitioners' equal protection claims is the traditional rational basis test (cf. Montgomery v. Daniels, 38 N.Y.2d 41, 59, 378 N.Y.S.2d 1, 16, 340 N.E.2d 444, 455). * Thus, the question for judicial resolution is whether there is a rational basis for separately classifying home relief and Supplemental Security Income recipients and then for distinguishing as the law now does in the benefits to be received by the members of the two classes.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review of a motion where a claim has been made that the claim is invalid? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion where a claim has been made that the claim is incorrect? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applied in reviewing a decision of the Minister refusing to grant Ministerial Relief? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion where a claim has been made that the claim is not reasonable? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for "plain error review" in the context of a claim for damages arising out of an error of judgment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted by not raising a claim on direct review or collateral review barred from raising it on collateral review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
