What is the standard of review for a writ of habeas corpus?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Porter v. Covello, Case No.: 18cv2345-CAB-NLS (S.D. Cal. 2019):
The Report sets forth the correct standard of review for a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Under 28 U.S.C. 2254(d):
Page 3
28 U.S.C. 2254(d); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 403, 412-13 (2000).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the current standard of review for a federal court to review a state conviction for habeas consideration under AEDPA? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a writ of habeas corpus application brought by a defendant who was convicted of assault because of comments made by a prosecutor? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does section 2241 of the Habeas corpus act as a substitute for a motion of habeas corpus? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a claim of prosecutorial misconduct on a writ of habeas corpus? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard for review on habeas corpus in the context of the prosecution's improper conduct? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does collateral review by habeas corpus apply as part of the direct review process? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a motion to compel for habeas corpus relief? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted by not raising a claim on direct review or collateral review barred from raising it on collateral review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
