What is the standard of review for a conclusion of law following a bench trial?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from United States v. Argueta-Rosales, 819 F.3d 1149 (9th Cir. 2016):

Conclusions of law following a bench trial are reviewed de novo. See Oswalt v. Resolute Indus., Inc., 642 F.3d 856, 859 (9th Cir.2011) ; cf. United States v. Knapp, 120 F.3d 928, 930 (9th Cir.1997) ("If a jury instruction misstates elements of a statutory crime, the standard of review is ... de novo. ").

Other Questions


How have courts reviewed findings of fact following a bench trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a decision following a bench trial on stipulated facts need to be reviewed de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for an appeal of a finding made after a trial? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the presumption of reasonableness review automatically engage with correctness standards of review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review in the context of a judicial review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review and what is the deference required to review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How does the Federal Trade Commission review its findings of law de novo after the bench trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.