What is the standard of review for a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support an enhancement?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Guerrero, B275571 (Cal. App. 2017):
The standard of review "[i]n considering a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support an enhancement [is as follows:] [W]e review the entire record in the light most favorable to the judgment to determine whether it contains substantial evidencethat is, evidence that is reasonable, credible, and of solid valuefrom which a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. (People v. Wilson (2008) 44 Cal.4th 758, 806 . . . .) We presume every fact in support of the judgment the trier of fact could have reasonably
Page 11
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
