What is the standard for determining liability for denial of access to the courts?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Best v. Lewis, 105 F.3d 664 (9th Cir. 1996):

2 We do not rule upon the question whether "deliberate indifference" is the correct standard for determining liability for denial of access to the courts. See, e.g., Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1333-35 (9th Cir.1990) (applying deliberate indifference standard to Eighth Amendment violation where prison officials denied inmate medical attention, but not applying deliberate indifference standard to right-of-access claim). This case was tried on the assumption that "deliberate indifference" was the appropriate standard, and at oral argument of this appeal both parties stated that they did not contest the application of that standard. We therefore accept the "deliberate indifference" standard for purposes of our decision, without addressing its correctness.

Other Questions


What are the implications of denial of access to the courts for the purposes of denying access to courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What are the implications of denial of access to the courts for the purposes of denying access? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of "substantive reasonableness" used by the Court of Appeal to determine whether a factor relied on by the sentencing court was unreasonable? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a federal district court to determine whether a state court or federal court has jurisdiction to rule on a federal Railroad Commission case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts treated claims for denial of access to court by the Department of Justice? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What authority does the Court have to issue summonses for the purpose of ascertaining the correctness of any return, making a return, determining the liability of any person for any internal revenue tax or collecting any such liability? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the legal standard used by the courts to determine the correct legal standard? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a state court have more latitude than a federal court to reasonably determine that a defendant has not satisfied the standard of conduct required for a motion to be heard in a civil case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts dealt with appeals in civil rights cases involving denial of access to the courts, religious persecution and physical mistreatment? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a court finds that a sanction imposed by a district court was an abuse of power, does the court have any authority to determine whether the sanction was abused or abused? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.