What is the scope of the appellate court's review of a writ of mandate ruling?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from City Of El Cajon v. County Of San Diego Local Agency Formation Comm'n, G041793, No. 06CC13348 (Cal. App. 2010):

"'"'In reviewing the trial court's ruling on a writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., 1085), the appellate court is ordinarily confined to an inquiry as to whether the findings and judgment of the trial court are supported by substantial evidence. [Citation.] However, the appellate court may make its own determination when the case involves resolution of questions of law where the facts are undisputed. [Citation.]' [Citation.]"' [Citation.]" (Corrales v. Bradstreet (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 33, 47-48.) In addition,

Page 10

Other Questions


What is the scope of the appellate court's review of the trial court's ruling on the writ of mandate? (California, United States of America)
After reviewing the record of a motion brought by appellant in the Superior Court of Appeal against the appellant, what is the appellant's request for an independent review of the record? (California, United States of America)
Is an appeal moot when, through no fault of the appellant, an event occurs which makes it impossible for the reviewing court to provide any effective relief to the appellant even when ruling in the appellant's favor? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a lower court's ruling for abuse of power, does the court review the evidence or evaluate the credibility of witnesses? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for appellate review of a trial court ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a challenge to a suppression ruling, how does the Court of Appeal review the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.