What is the scope of discretion of the courts in deciding whether to grant discretion to a city councilor in a discretionary action?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Robert L., In re, 21 Cal.App.4th 1057, 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 654 (Cal. App. 1993):

"The legal principles that govern the subject of discretionary action vary greatly with context. [Citation] They are derived from the common law or statutes under which discretion is conferred." (City of Sacramento v. Drew (1989) 207 Cal.App.3d 1287, 1298, 255 Cal.Rptr. 704.) The scope of discretion lies in the particular law to be applied. (Id. at p. 1297, 255 Cal.Rptr. 704.)

Other Questions


In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a trial court's discretion in deciding whether to grant relief to a plaintiff? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a trial court's exercise of discretion is within the scope of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for discretion of the Court of Appeal in deciding whether to grant relief under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
What is the scope of the court's discretion in deciding whether to dismiss the testimony of an informant in an impeachment trial? (California, United States of America)
How much discretion, within reason, does the Supreme Court have to exercise in deciding whether to limit the scope of limits on the use of certain constitutional provisions? (California, United States of America)
What is the record of the US Supreme Court when it comes to deciding whether to grant relief to a plaintiff? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered past conduct of an attorney in deciding whether to grant sanctions? (California, United States of America)
How has the court considered the impact of a related action in determining whether to bring an action to trial? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.