What is the scope and purpose of the California Constitution's due process clause?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Lampley v. Alvares, 123 Cal.Rptr. 181, 50 Cal.App.3d 124 (Cal. App. 1975):
3 Article I, section 13 of the California Constitution, which provides that no person shall be deprived of property without due process of law, has been held to be identical in scope and purpose with the due process clause of the federal Constitution. (Gray v. Whitmore (1971) 17 Cal.App.3d 1, 20, 94 Cal.Rptr. 904.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any difference between due process under the California Constitution and the federal Constitution? (California, United States of America)
Does the SVP Act's provision for an indeterminate term violate the due process clause, ex post facto clause and double jeopardy clause? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes misconduct under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution when it infects the trial with such unfairness as to make the conviction a denial of due process? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3003.5(b) of the California Code of Civil Procedure restrict sex offender registration requirements for purposes of the ex post facto clause? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3003.5(b) of the California Code of Civil Procedure restrict sex offender registration requirements for the purposes of the ex post facto clause? (California, United States of America)
Does a process server deprive a named defendant of his constitutional due process rights by failing to serve properly, then signing a false affidavit? (California, United States of America)
Does the sale of real property in foreclosure constitute a voluntary sale for purposes of income tax purposes? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between due process and speedy trial violations under the California State Constitution? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3003.5(b) of the California Code of Civil Procedure restrict sex offender registration requirements for purposes of the ex post facto clause? (California, United States of America)
