What is the relevant case law on abuse of discretion?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Johnson, B216951 (Cal. App. 2011):
We review any ruling on the admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion. (People v. Guerra (2006) 37 Cal.4th 1067, 1113.) Evidence is relevant if it has any
Page 24
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the Court of Appeal have discretion to admit evidence of abuse of power or abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test of relevance, relevance and abuse of discretion in determining the admissibility of evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is relevant evidence relevant for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevance of a relevance ruling for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does a restitution order for abuse of discretion constitute an abuse of the court's discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for "abuse of discretion" in cases involving abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Is abuse of discretion an abuse of the discretion test? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion in determining whether a judge abused discretion in finding that a plaintiff's photographs were prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion on relevance and the exclusion of evidence under the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Is gang evidence relevant and not unduly prejudicial for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
