The following excerpt is from Singh v. Holder, 602 F.3d 982 (9th Cir. 2010):
13 This standard has been described as a "heightened" one, Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d at 1047, which it is as compared with our earlier standard regarding the availability of corroborating evidence. The new statutory standard of review regarding corroboration is the same, though, as that used to review other factual findings. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(b)(4)(B) (providing that "administrative findings of fact are conclusive on a court reviewing an order of removal unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.