California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Singh v. Superior Court of Contra Costa Cnty., A148451 (Cal. App. 2017):
sentence leaves open not one, but three possible interpretations of sanctionable conduct: a late request that presents no good cause for a continuance; a request that presents no good cause for being late; or a request that fails on both counts. While counsel has a professional responsibility to be aware of all local rules (see Moyal v. Lanphear (1989) 208 Cal.App.3d 491, 499), she cannot be expected to understand how to comply with an unclear rule of court. For a violation of a local rule to be "knowing," counsel must be able to understandin advancewhat conduct the rule proscribes.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.