What is the impact of the review department's proposal of discipline against a referee?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Howard v. State Bar, 270 Cal.Rptr. 856, 51 Cal.3d 215, 793 P.2d 62 (Cal. 1990):

5 We have also frequently noted that the review department's proposal of discipline is to be accorded greater weight than that of the hearing panel or referee. (Coppock v. State Bar (1988) 44 Cal.3d 665, 682, 244 Cal.Rptr. 462, 749 P.2d 1317; Galardi v. State Bar (1987) 43 Cal.3d 683, 693-694, 238 Cal.Rptr. 774, 739 P.2d 134.)

Other Questions


In reviewing a section 654 challenge, what standard of review does the court apply in reviewing the challenge? (California, United States of America)
What is the impact of a court's order to appoint a discovery referee on a party's ability to pay the referee's fees? (California, United States of America)
What is the scope of the environmental impact review (EIR) required by the California Department of Environment? (California, United States of America)
Does the cumulative impact of water discharges need to be considered in the environmental impact review? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between the findings of a hearing panel and the recommendations of the review department for discipline? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the administrative record of the California Department of Justice be reviewed for review? (California, United States of America)
What is the range of discipline recommended by the California Bar Review Department for an attorney who misappropriated funds from his clients while he had no disciplinary record? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the California Bar Review Department's findings and recommendations on discipline for a barrister? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for reviewing state law errors at the guilt phase of a trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant denied equal protection because he has not received either intercase proportionality review or appropriate intracase review? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.