What is the gravamen of the crime of forcible rape?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Olivares, C058685 (Cal. App. 10/1/2009), C058685 (Cal. App. 2009):

"The gravamen of the crime of forcible rape is a sexual penetration accomplished against the victim's will by means of force, violence, duress, menace, or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury. As reflected in the surveyed case law, in a forcible rape prosecution the jury determines whether the use of force served to overcome the will of the victim to thwart or resist the attack, not whether the use of such force physically facilitated sexual penetration or prevented the victim from physically resisting her attacker." (People v. Griffin (2004) 33 Cal.4th 1015, 1027.) The applicable question is whether defendant used force sufficient to accomplish intercourse with the victim against her will, not whether the force was sufficient to overcome her physical strength and ability to resist. (Id. at p. 1028.)

In a prosecution for rape, the requirement of force is minimal; all that is required is that which is sufficient to commit the act without the victim's consent. (People v. Iniguez (1994) 7 Cal.4th 847, 855-856.) "The kind of physical force is immaterial; it may consist in laying hold of and kissing a woman against her will." (People v. Cicero (1984) 157 Cal.App.3d 465, 475; see People v. Bradbury (1907) 151 Cal. 675, 677 [for assault with intent to commit rape, "`"The kind of physical force is immaterial; . . . it may consist in the taking of indecent liberties with a woman, or laying hold of and kissing her against her will"'"].)

Other Questions


Does a forcible sex crime have to be considered a non-forcible sex crime under the elements test? (California, United States of America)
Is a non-forcible sex crime considered a lesser included offense of the forcible sex crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the definition of a forcible or non-forcible crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is a lesser included crime to another crime where both crimes are charged? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who committed an assault with intent to commit sex crimes such as kidnapping, rape and forcible oral copulation receive a determinate sentence for the assault that followed? (California, United States of America)
Is a person who aids or abets a crime liable for the crime if the original crime was committed independently by another person? (California, United States of America)
Is a charged crime a natural and probable consequence of the target crime if the charged crime was reasonably foreseeable? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.