What is the effect of the prosecutor's comments to a jury in a capital murder trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Vieira, 106 P.3d 990, 25 Cal.Rptr.3d 337, 35 Cal.4th 264 (Cal. 2005):

The prosecutor told the jury that under section 190.3, factor (k), the jury

[25 Cal.Rptr.3d 360]

could consider sympathy and mercy for defendant in determining the appropriate penalty. The prosecutor then added: "I'd be happy if you show [defendant] that exact same mercy and sympathy that he showed those people on Elm Street that night. It's absolutely none." Defendant contends this was misconduct. But as we have held, it is proper for the prosecutor to argue, based on the evidence, that a capital defendant does not deserve sympathy. (People v. Ochoa, supra, 19 Cal.4th at pp. 464-465, 79 Cal.Rptr.2d 408, 966 P.2d 442.) The prosecutor did no more than this.

[25 Cal.Rptr.3d 360]

Other Questions


When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted comments made by a prosecutor in a civil case where the prosecutor suggested that the prosecutor's theories were not the exclusive theories that may be considered by the court? (California, United States of America)
What are the principles of a motion for a new trial where a witness in a murder trial later dies before the trial has even begun? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the prosecutor's comments to the jury in a death penalty trial? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor criticizes a defense attorney's conduct at trial, can the prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct if the prosecutor's arguments are not in the context of the defense counsel's conduct? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for misconduct by a prosecutor at a civil trial where the prosecutor made comments that defense counsel did not object to? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor challenged nine prospective jurors for cause at a jury trial for the murder of a man who was found guilty of murder by reason of insanity, can they be excused for cause? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor peremptorily challenges a prospective jury in a murder trial, does the prosecutor have to provide a list of prospective jurors that they were "opposed to the death penalty"? (California, United States of America)
In a capital murder case, in what circumstances will the California Supreme Court order that a juror should not submit a questionnaire for the purpose of selecting a jury in capital murder cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a restriction on comment by the trial court on comments by a defendant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.