When a prosecutor challenged nine prospective jurors for cause at a jury trial for the murder of a man who was found guilty of murder by reason of insanity, can they be excused for cause?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Maury, 133 Cal.Rptr.2d 561, 30 Cal.4th 342, 68 P.3d 1 (Cal. 2003):

The prosecutor challenged nine prospective jurors for cause. The trial court granted eight of those challenges. Defendant now claims that the court erred in granting six of the eight challenges for cause. As will appear, because the challenged prospective jurors indicated either that they could not apply the death penalty under any circumstance, or were not prepared to impose the death penalty and were undecided as to their ability to do so, the trial court did not err in excusing them. (People v. Cunningham, supra, 25 Cal.4th at pp. 980-982, 108 Cal.Rptr.2d 291, 25 P.3d 519.) Moreover, at the most, the potential jurors' statements were equivocal and conflicting regarding their ability to render a death verdict. Thus, we must defer to the trial court's determination of their states of mind.

Other Questions


When a defendant enters a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity at trial for a first-degree murder, can he still be found guilty of first degree murder? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor peremptorily challenges a prospective jury in a murder trial, does the prosecutor have to provide a list of prospective jurors that they were "opposed to the death penalty"? (California, United States of America)
Does a trial court's invitation to the prosecutor to state his reasons for excusing a prospective juror constitute an implicit finding that appellant has established a prima facie case of intentional racial discrimination? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be able to appeal against his conviction for the murder of an elderly woman who was found guilty of murder by reason that he failed to obtain a certificate of probable cause? (California, United States of America)
Is a prospective juror's comment that appellant would be set free if found not guilty by reason of insanity prejudiced the entire jury? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor criticizes a defense attorney's conduct at trial, can the prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct if the prosecutor's arguments are not in the context of the defense counsel's conduct? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor challenge for cause a prospective juror for cause? (California, United States of America)
Does a prospective juror have to rely on a "prosecutor relied on to excuse" to excuse the prospective jury? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of aiding and abetting a murder if the actual perpetrator of the same murder is convicted of murder? (California, United States of America)
Can a new trial be granted in a civil case where a jury member has been found guilty of misconduct by reason of failing to attend the trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.