What is the effect of the court's admonishment or admonishment of the jury to disregard the testimony?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Robinson, 102 Cal.Rptr.2d 179, 85 Cal.App.4th 434 (Cal. App. 2000):

As to each of these incidents, the court either ordered the testimony stricken or admonished the jury to disregard it. Jurors are presumed to have followed the court's instructions, since "the crucial assumption underlying our constitutional system of trial by jury is that jurors generally understand and faithfully follow instructions." (People v. Delgado (1993) 5 Cal.4th 312, 331.)

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the trial court admonish the jury to disregard the testimony of an injured witness? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of striking or admonishing the jury to disregard inadmissible testimony by a police officer in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated expert testimony in the context of police investigations and subsequent court proceedings? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of striking the testimony and admonishing the jury not to consider it against defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have to grant immunity to a witness who testified in a witness testimony that the testimony was inconsistent with the instructions? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the court's comment on defendant's testimony that there is a reasonable probability the jury can agree on a verdict? (California, United States of America)
Is it improper for a court, with the consent of the accused and his counsel, to provide a transcript to the jury in lieu of rereading testimony in open court? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Superior Court have authority to the effect that any fair, reasonable doubt concerning the existence of a municipal corporation's eminent domain power is resolved by the courts against the corporation? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.