What is the difference between an intended and an unintended crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Gastelum, 253 Cal.Rptr.3d 449, 40 Cal.App.5th 772 (Cal. App. 2019):

People v. McCoy (2001) 25 Cal.4th 1111, 1117, 108 Cal.Rptr.2d 188, 24 P.3d 1210.) The intended crime is commonly described as the "target" offense, while the unintended crime is described as the "nontarget" offense. ( People v. Prettyman (1996) 14 Cal.4th 248, 254, 58 Cal.Rptr.2d 827, 926 P.2d 1013.)

Other Questions


If a criminal commits a crime in a different county than the one where the crime was committed, would that change the outcome of the criminal trial if the crime occurred in the other county? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between aider and abettor culpability for a target crime and an unintended crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the target crime? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant who knowingly aids and abets criminal conduct guilty of not only the intended crime but also of any other crime the perpetrator actually commits as a result of the crime? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant who committed a crime under a different sentencing scheme that existed at the time he committed the crime be sentenced to a different sentence? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be held criminally responsible as an accomplice not only for the crime he intended to do but also for any other crime that is a natural and probable consequence of the crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a crime proscribing a negligent act and a crime with a scienter element? (California, United States of America)
Is a lesser included crime to another crime where both crimes are charged? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is a charged crime a natural and probable consequence of the target crime if the charged crime was reasonably foreseeable? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.