The following excerpt is from Hanna v. Riveland, 87 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 1996):
I write separately only to observe that our holding in this case and the opinion in Schwendeman v. Wallenstein, 971 F.2d 313, 316 (9th Cir.1992), must be limited to the records before the two panels. In neither case was the evidence so overwhelming as to convince us that the constitutionally deficient jury instruction was harmless error.
Had the evidence in the case before us been overwhelming, I would have found the error harmless.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.