What is the definition of stalking and what is the test for stalking?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Parlante, C071771 (Cal. App. 2017):

To commit the offense of stalking, a defendant must "willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly [follow] or willfully and maliciously [harass] another person and . . . [make] a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her immediate family." ( 646.9, subd. (a); People v. Ewing (1999) 76 Cal.App.4th 199, 210 (Ewing).) The term "harass" is statutorily defined as a "course of conduct" that "seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose." ( 646.9, subd. (e).) A "credible threat" is a threat "made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family" ( 649, subd. (g).) Section 646.9 provides that "[c]onstitutionally protected activity" is not included in the statutory definitions of either " 'course of conduct' " or " 'credible threat.' " ( 646.9, subds. (f) & (g).)

Other Questions


In a personal injury case, is stalking evidence inadmissible because the stalking evidence was not presented in the trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of stalking based on a single stalking offence? (California, United States of America)
Is a prospective juror who equivices with every single definition of the definition of a crime a potential juror? (California, United States of America)
What is the definition of an offence for possession or possession of a firearm? (California, United States of America)
What is the definition of a confidential personnel record in the California Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the state of the law on the definition of intentional killing? (California, United States of America)
Is the reasonable doubt instruction insufficient to support the definition of reasonable doubt in CALCRIM No. 220? (California, United States of America)
Does the definition of reasonable doubt given during jury selection constitute a jury instruction? (California, United States of America)
Does the term "substantial" in the definition of an aggravating circumstance in a murder case apply to determine whether the accused has a history of serious assaultive criminal convictions? (California, United States of America)
Does the definition of "secular activity" need to be changed so that it is not discriminatory or restrictive? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.