What is the current standard of review for multiple conspiracies?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Young, 89 F.3d 848 (9th Cir. 1996):
1 In United States v. Anguiano, 873 F.2d 1314, 1317 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 969 (1989), we reviewed de novo whether the evidence was sufficient to support a multiple conspiracies instruction. However, this apparent split of circuit authority on the proper standard of review does not affect the outcome of this case. Even under the more stringent de novo standard, we conclude that the district court did not err in rejecting the proffered multiple conspiracies instruction.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If a court finds that a plaintiff has been denied a right to sue under a different legal standard than under the current standard of care, can the finding be reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a criminal sentence for substantive reasonableness, what is the current standard of review and what are the implications of this? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the current standard of review for a federal court to review a state conviction for habeas consideration under AEDPA? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted by not raising a claim on direct review or collateral review barred from raising it on collateral review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there a single conspiracy as charged in the indictment or multiple conspiracies? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the current standard of review under Rule 42(a) of the summary contempt process? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applicable to review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review in the context of a judicial review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review and what is the deference required to review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the presumption of reasonableness review automatically engage with correctness standards of review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
