What is the consequence of the trial court's denial of a plaintiff's request for disclosure of police personnel records?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Castaneda, A155747 (Cal. App. 2020):
Castaneda requests that this court independently review the record to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying his request for disclosure of police personnel records under Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531 (Pitchess). The People concede he is entitled to such review. We conclude the trial court erred.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can we independently examine the record made by the trial court in denying a defendant's motion for disclosure of police personnel records? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, can the court conduct an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing and the records reviewed by the trial court to determine whether any records were improperly withheld? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion for disclosure of police personnel records? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion Page 15 for disclosure of police personnel records? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated a motion for disclosure of personnel records of two police officers? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion for disclosure of police personnel records? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal's interpretation of section 1045(e) of the Penal Code apply to the disclosure of police officer personnel records? (California, United States of America)
What are the findings of the trial court on a motion for a new trial where a jury was not adversely affected by an audio recording that was secretly recorded during jury deliberations? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion for disclosure of police personnel records? (California, United States of America)
