What is the test for determining whether a court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion for disclosure of police personnel records?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Francel, F071399 (Cal. App. 2016):
Upon appeal, we independently examine the record made by the trial court "to determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion for disclosure of police personnel records." (People v. Prince (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1179, 1285.)
Page 8
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether a court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion for disclosure of police personnel records? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion Page 15 for disclosure of police personnel records? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion for disclosure of police personnel records? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a court abused its discretion in denying a defendant's motion Page 6 for disclosure of police personnel records? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a court abused its discretion in denying a motion for disclosure of personnel records? (California, United States of America)
Can we independently examine the record made by the trial court in denying a defendant's motion for disclosure of police personnel records? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court abuse its discretion when it denied a defendant's motion to exclude the testimony of Page 35 of the Defendant's lawyer as more prejudicial than probative? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
In arguing that the trial court abused its power to deny a motion to sever an indecent exposure charge from a sexual assault charge, does defendant rely on Earle v Earle to argue that the motion was abused? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
