What is the burden of showing error by cross-appellants?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Clement v. Shammas, B253933 (Cal. App. 2015):
Finally, even assuming the issue of inadequate damages is properly before this court, the contention would fail. It is a basic principle of appellate procedure that "appellants, including cross-appellants, bear the burden of affirmatively showing error by an adequate record" (Amato v. Mercury Casualty Co. (1993) 18 Cal.App.4th 1784, 1794),
Page 9
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the burden of showing error to a plaintiff who failed to show error at trial? (California, United States of America)
When the error is that the error was not intentional, does the error result in the error not being corrected? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of producing a record that affirmatively shows error? (California, United States of America)
What is the appellant's burden to affirmatively show error? (California, United States of America)
What is the appellant's burden to affirmatively show error? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of showing reversible error by an adequate record? (California, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have the burden to show error when they argue only generalities? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden on Grappo to prove error and prejudice arising from an error? (California, United States of America)
What is defendant's burden to show prejudice from the asserted errors? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of showing reversible error by a party? (California, United States of America)
