California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Lohman, 6 Cal.App.3d 760, 86 Cal.Rptr. 221 (Cal. App. 1970):
Except for the period December 1, 1967 to January 9, 1968, the delay is explained by the successive proceedings to determine present sanity. Such delay for such purpose does not deny the right to a speedy trial (People v. Hocking, 140 Cal.App.2d 778, 296 P.2d 59; People v. McGill, 257 Cal.App.2d 759, 761, 65 Cal.Rptr. 482).
The appellant has the burden of producing a record that affirmatively shows error (People v. Phillips, 163 Cal.App.2d 541, 545, 329 P.2d 621; People v. Rocha, 130 Cal.App.2d 656, 663, 279 P.2d 836).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.