What is the burden of proving service of process valid when a defendant claims default and default judgment because of lack of personal jurisdiction?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Leontaritis v. Koursaris, B219095, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC383073 (Cal. App. 2011):

When a defendant claims a default and default judgment are void for lack of personal jurisdiction due to invalid service of process, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove the service of process was valid. (Summers v. McClanahan (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 403, 413.) We review de novo the question whether service of process was valid. (Hearn v. Howard (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 1193, 1200.)

Other Questions


Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the prosecution reduced the burden of proving a defendant's guilt by failing to instruct the jury that refusal was insufficient to establish guilt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that he was denied his constitutional right to due process of law because the trial court relieved the prosecution of its burden of establishing that defendant acted with malice? (California, United States of America)
Is compliance with service of process essential to establish personal jurisdiction over a defendant? (California, United States of America)
Is a claim for damages brought by defendant in a personal injury action brought by plaintiff against defendant in the Superior Court of Appeal against Defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that a default judgment is void because it awards damages in breach of due process? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant have the burden of proving that the same day service is proper? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a claim of misconduct in a criminal case brought by a defendant that the prosecution made comments that reduced the burden of proving reasonable doubt with common sense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for denying fundamental due process of law in the context of a defendant's claim that the conditions of his confinement constitute punishment in advance of judgment? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.