What is the burden of proving an agency has regularly performed its official duties?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Reyes v. City of Los Angeles, B224089 (Cal. App. 2011):
"An agency is presumed to have regularly performed its official duties (Evid. Code 664), and the petitioner therefore has the burden of proof to demonstrate wherein the proceedings were unfair, in excess of jurisdiction or showed prejudicial abuse of discretion. Afford v. Pierno (1972) 27 Cal.App.3d 682, 691."
Page 4
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the term "incapacitated for the performance of duty" mean "substantial inability of the applicant to perform his usual duties"? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted the presumption that an official duty has been regularly performed? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving intent to prevent or deter a police officer from performing his duty? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that plaintiffs had the burden to prove allocation of the premiums? (California, United States of America)
Does the fiduciary have the burden of proving that he or she breached his or her duty of providing a timely and timely notice of an action? (California, United States of America)
Can a prosecutor argue that a defendant has a duty or burden to produce evidence to prove their innocence? (California, United States of America)
Does a student have to prove her performance was not a factor in her failure to meet standards or otherwise performing a satisfactory manner? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of an offense against an officer engaged in the performance of official duties unless the officer was acting lawfully at the time? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that counsel deficient performance was reasonable under prevailing professional norms? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that the performance of the trial counsel was deficient and prejudiced? (California, United States of America)
