What facts support reasonable suspicion in this case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Arredondo, B284959 (Cal. App. 2018):
Indeed, there are more facts here to support reasonable suspicion than were found adequate in People v. Conway (1994) 25 Cal.App.4th 385. There, the detaining officer had received a report of a burglary in progress in the neighborhood in which he was on
Page 6
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law or case law that supports the argument that a prosecution case is reasonable in its entirety? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury case, what is the test for assuming that every fact the trier of fact could reasonably deduce from the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Are there any cases law or rules of professional conduct or case law or professional conduct that support an arbitrator's finding that an attorney fee is reasonable? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that there is reasonable suspicion? (California, United States of America)
What facts support reasonable suspicion for a police officer to detain two people in a car after receiving a report of a burglary? (California, United States of America)
Are detentions based on reasonable suspicion or reasonable suspicion lawful? (California, United States of America)
Are there any cases that support the argument that a person who is not a plaintiff in a civil case is entitled to be considered a witness? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
