Is there any case law or case law that supports the argument that a prosecution case is reasonable in its entirety?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Woods, 120 Cal.App.4th 929, 16 Cal.Rptr.3d 174 (Cal. App. 2004):
from investigation to accusation. For it is only then that the assistance of one versed in the `intricacies . . . of law' [citation] is needed to assure that the prosecution's case encounters `the crucible of meaningful adversarial testing.' [Citation.]" (Moran v. Burbine (1986) 475 U.S. 412, 430, 106 S.Ct. 1135, 89 L.Ed.2d 410, italics added.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the evidence that supports the argument that the evidence supports the proposition that there is no evidence supporting the claim? (California, United States of America)
Is there compelling legal argument to support the argument that the definition of reasonable doubt is unconstitutional? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that a search warrant obtained from a cell phone records and other data extracted from the phone records is sufficient to support the claim that the search warrant is invalid? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have any evidence to support her claim that the court failed to review the supporting documents to determine whether attorney fees requested were reasonable in need and amount? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
What are the reasons why defense counsel opted not to object during the prosecution's rebuttal argument? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
Is the reasonable doubt instruction insufficient to support the definition of reasonable doubt in CALCRIM No. 220? (California, United States of America)
Does the evidence support the finding that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the sexual assault charges against Backman were not supported by the weight of the evidence? (California, United States of America)
Can counsel for petitioner present evidence and make a reasonable argument in support of their position? (California, United States of America)
