What constitutes an overt act in an attempt to commit a crime?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Shah, A138475 (Cal. App. 2016):

"[A]s provided by section 21a, '[a]n attempt to commit a crime consists of two elements: a specific intent to commit the crime, and a direct but ineffectual act done toward its commission.' " (People v. Toledo (2001) 26 Cal.4th 221, 229.) "The overt act element of attempt requires conduct that goes beyond 'mere preparation' and 'show[s] that [defendant] is putting his or her plan into action.' (People v. Superior Court (Decker) (2007) 41 Cal.4th 1, 8; see, e.g., [Toledo, at p.] 230 ['Under the provisions of section 21a, a defendant properly may be found guilty of [an attempt crime] whenever, acting with the specific intent to commit the offense . . . , the defendant performs an act that goes beyond mere preparation and indicates that he or she is putting a plan into action']; see also CALJIC No. 6.00 [mere preparation . . . is not sufficient to constitute an attempt] CALCRIM No. 460 [requiring a 'direct step' that 'goes beyond planning or

Page 72

Other Questions


What constitutes an overt act in an attempt to commit a crime? (California, United States of America)
Is an assault committed as an attempt to commit a crime separate and distinct from a crime? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
If a criminal commits a crime in a different county than the one where the crime was committed, would that change the outcome of the criminal trial if the crime occurred in the other county? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
Does a statute retroactively increase the punishment for a crime committed after the crime has been committed violate the ex post facto clause? (California, United States of America)
Is the crime of conspiracy complete "when two or more persons agree to commit a crime and do some overt act in furtherance of the agreement"? (California, United States of America)
Is a crime committed in association with a gang if the parties relied on their common gang membership and the apparatus of the gang in committing the crimes? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant who commits a violent crime against several victims more culpable than a violent offender who commits violent crimes against one person more than one? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.