The following excerpt is from Foreign Trade Banking Corp. v. Gerseta Corp., 142 N.E. 607, 237 N.Y. 265 (N.Y. 1923):
[2] What were the rights of set-off of such an innocent party? The contract of purchase and sale between the importer and the purchaser requires payment in cash or trade acceptances. The question arises whether the purchaser can set off a demand which it held at the time of the sale which was due at the time the suit was commenced. The rule is laid down in Hogan v. Shorb, 24 Wend. 458, 464, which is on all fours with this case. The action was brought by the principal on a contract for the purchase price of the goods. The goods were sold by an agent, but the name of the principal was not disclosed. It was held, that although the sale was a cash sale, and the purchaser, when he obtained the goods, did not intend to abide by his contract but proposed to set off a demand against the agent, he could set off a note of the agent given prior to the delivery of the goods in question but maturing thereafter; that notice after the sale would not defeat any equity already existing between the purchaser and the seller; that defendant had such equity; that the purchaser had a right to buy the goods for the purpose of obtaining payment of his debt, and the right to set off. The court said:
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.