What are the legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for an adverse employment action against plaintiff?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Schulz v. Sutter E. Bay Hosps., A136276, A137208 (Cal. App. 2015):
135 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1097-1098.) Here, the Hospitals identify the following legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for its allegedly adverse employment action against plaintiff. (See Guz, supra, 24 Cal.4th at p. 356; Kelly v. Stamps.com Inc., supra, 135 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1097-1098.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a plaintiff rely on the termination of her employment with defendant as the adverse employment action for the purposes of her retaliation cause of action? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
Is a plaintiff entitled to (3) reasonable accommodations and (4) an adverse employment action because of the disability or perceived disability? (California, United States of America)
Can an employer force an employee to engage in "protected activity" in order to avoid an adverse employment action? (California, United States of America)
What is the burden of proving that an employer has a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason? (California, United States of America)
What is the employer's burden as a moving party in an adverse employment action? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on the test for determining whether an employer meets its initial burden as a moving party in an adverse employment action? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of an instruction to a jury in a personal injury action where defendant assumed that plaintiff's employer had provided plaintiff with a safe place to work? (California, United States of America)
Does a finding that an unfair labor practice-related reason for termination constitute a preemption of a plaintiff's cause of action based on other illegal reasons? (California, United States of America)
