California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Bailey v. Citibank, N.A., 280 Cal.Rptr.3d 546, 66 Cal.App.5th 335 (Cal. App. 2021):
Plaintiffs primarily rely on Sevier v. Locher, supra , 222 Cal.App.3d 1082, 272 Cal.Rptr. 287. However, the first sentence of that case plainly announces the nature of the appellate court's ruling: "In this case we hold that a transfer of title to real property after the prescriptive period for adverse possession of the property has begun does not interrupt or terminate the running of the prescriptive period." ( Id. at p. 1084, 272 Cal.Rptr. 287.) In Sevier , the adverse possession or prescriptive use by the Lochers concerning a driveway easement
[280 Cal.Rptr.3d 568]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.