Is there any case law relating to the adequacy of reasons set out in the WCAT-2009-00048?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from WCAT-2011-01606 (Re), 2011 CanLII 50833 (BC WCAT):
Although not binding upon me, I note the helpful summary of jurisprudence relating to the adequacy of reasons set out in WCAT-2009-00048, dated January 8, 2009. The following extract from Baldwin v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal 2007 BCSC 942 is also of particular relevance:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the relevant time frame for calculating a delay under s. 11(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada for the purpose of computing a reasonable trial within a reasonable time? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the argument that appeal is from a result not a reason but a reason? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of reasonableness for using the term “reasonable” in a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the adequacy of reasons sufficient to be set aside? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between reasonable notice and reasonable working notice? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an occupier to prove reasonable steps taken by the occupier were reasonable in all circumstances? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a decision maker review an entered order or related reasons? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons given in reasons delivered in a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for "reasonableness" for a review body to determine whether a decision was reasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
