What are some cases where the court has ruled that records of a previous action and minutes of settlement must be produced?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Chappel v. Dysko, 2008 CanLII 91 (ON SC):
The moving party refers to various cases, including Allison v. Duffus, [2006] O.J. No. 4679. This 2006 decision included many discovery production related matters. Particular reference was to requirement that records of a previous action and minutes of settlement and related documents be produced. The focus was directed to Rule 30.1.01 and a deemed undertaking. Focus was not directed to a wider privilege.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can Rule 17 (23) of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to parties to settlement discussions at a case conference? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law where an applicant has abandoned a claim at a settlement conference to bring the case closer to settlement? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with contempt cases where a contemnor disregarded a court order to deliver business records? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of the Court of Appeal's ruling in cases involving sexual assault cases? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court award costs under Rule 24(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a family law case? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a settlement with an oil company that has previously been denied certification to the Court of Appeal preclude certification being granted in the context of a settlement? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the rule on cross-examination in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with an application to combine defective water heater cases in the same action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for obtaining medical records and sexual activity records in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that supports the argument that a breach of the law by an individual who has committed acts of contempt of court? (Ontario, Canada)
