Is it appropriate to impute to the payor the income that he would have earned if he had not quit his job?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Lindsay v. Jeffrey, 2014 ONCJ 1 (CanLII):
[44] In Thompson v. Gilchrest, supra, the court found that it was appropriate to impute to the payor the income that he would have earned if he hadn’t quit his job. The court writes at paragraphs 37-39:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When imputing income is imputed in an original order, can the payor continue to impute income? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the range of income impute by a judge when it is difficult to impute income to a recipient? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a payor be imputed income to the payor if he voluntarily retired to frustrate a material change order? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a payor who argues that imputed income is no longer appropriate? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a payor intentionally under-employed if the payor chooses not to work when he is capable of earning income? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for imputing income for an employee who has not earned any income since 2001? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a payor have to produce a statement of income, printout from his employer, and a copy of his T4 and 2008 income tax returns? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the appropriate amount of income imputed to the child of a deceased father? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a court impute income to a spouse who chooses to work less than he or she is capable of earning? (Ontario, Canada)
How is impute income imputed in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
