What is the test for a payor who argues that imputed income is no longer appropriate?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Janik v. Drotlef, 2018 ONCJ 287 (CanLII):
A payor who argues that imputed income is no longer appropriate must go beyond his or her “declared income”. He or she must address both why income had to be imputed in the first place and establish that it is either no longer appropriate to impute income as representations as to income should now be accepted; or if income should still be imputed now, it should be done at a different amount: see ¶ 52 of Trang v. Trang.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When imputing income is imputed in an original order, can the payor continue to impute income? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a payor be imputed income to the payor if he voluntarily retired to frustrate a material change order? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the range of income impute by a judge when it is difficult to impute income to a recipient? (Ontario, Canada)
Is it appropriate to impute to the payor the income that he would have earned if he had not quit his job? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the appropriate amount of income imputed to the child of a deceased father? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a payor have to produce a statement of income, printout from his employer, and a copy of his T4 and 2008 income tax returns? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for imputing income to a payor who is intentionally underemployed? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for imputing income imputed to the recipient wife in a spousal support claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a family corporation be imputed on income imputation if it has not provided additional benefits? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for imputing income from self-employment on a spouse's income tax return? (Ontario, Canada)
