If the unjust enrichment analysis had reached the juristic reason stage, in this case it appears to me that the stepfather here had a clear donative intent, that is, intent to make a gift to W.W.R. That this intent leads to the result already established under the Fraudulent Conveyance Act does not, in my view, take it out of the established category of juristic reason established in Peter v. Beblow.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.