Can a plaintiff challenge the impugned conveyance under the Fraudulent Conveyance Act?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Young v. Young, 1999 CanLII 5096 (BC SC):
It is open to the plaintiff in this case to challenge the impugned conveyance under the Fraudulent Conveyance Act. As Spencer J. held in Chan v. Chan, unreported, 2 March 1993, Vancouver C910142 (B.C.S.C.), a spouse with a potential claim under the Family Relations Act falls within the description in s.1 of the Fraudulent Conveyance Act as being an "other" with a just and lawful remedy.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is the petitioner's evidence of her taking her hand not challenged or challenged? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where a plaintiff is seeking to call witnesses who would testify that they were not involved in fraudulent activities? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a need for physical or temporal proximity between a plaintiff and plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a judge finds that a plaintiff has violated a plaintiff’s human rights in a civil case, does this rule apply? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for adding plaintiffs to a proposed class action where the named and proposed representative plaintiff has no legitimate cause of action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to obtain damages for a fraudulent misrepresentation in the form of a document? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to an award for costs of future care for a plaintiff who was injured in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to be treated as a thin-skulled plaintiff for the purpose of damage assessment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining the apportionment of fault between a plaintiff and plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a plaintiff and a plaintiff who asserts that their engagement is at an end because of disability and resultant absence from work? (British Columbia, Canada)
