What is the test for delivering an offer to settle?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Haynes v. Fontaine, 1980 CanLII 547 (BC SC):

3. In Jager v. Barnett, Vancouver No. 43398/73, Legg J. said: "In my view the two subrules should be read to mean that, if a plaintiff wishes to obtain an award of double costs for the tariff items mentioned in R. 57(18), he should deliver the offer to settle so as to give the defendant, through his solicitor, reasonable notice of the otter and an opportunity to consider the offer with a view to accepting or rejecting it. What is reasonable notice depends on the circumstances of each case.''

Other Questions


Can an offer to settle a claim be delivered without an offer of settlement? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an initial and comprehensive settlement offer made by the respondent and a revised offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an offer that does not comply with Rule 37 B constitute an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an offer to settle providing that each party bears its own costs an offer under Rule 37A? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a second offer to settle a claim for damages be considered as a result of the withdrawal of an initial offer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does post-judgment interest apply from the date that an offer to settle is delivered? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any evidence that an offer to settle was wholly achieved prior to the delivery of the offer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a formal offer to settle be sent to an email address rather than the formal address for delivery? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court refuse to accept an offer to settle with the orders made in a family proceeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness of an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.