The courts have held that the true nature of the plaintiff’s claim must, if a garnishing order before judgment is to be upheld, be for a sum certain or liquidated claim. In Mitchell v. Fournier 1949 CanLII 445 (BC SC), [1949] 1 W.W.R. 349 (B.C.S.C.) Mr. Justice Manson, viewed those proceedings as an action for unliquidated damages. At page 352 he finds: In the case at Bar we have a claim in the nature of damages but in the form of a liquidated claim. The mere phrasing of the endorsement on the writ cannot change the true nature of the claim.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.