The court cited Knowles v. Peter, supra, for its expression that the attachment of debts before judgment is an extraordinary process which requires meticulous observance of the requirements. The court did not make a decision with respect to the veracity of the off-setting claims, but noted that the circumstances were such that it was possible that the debt alleged was either partially or fully off-set by the unreported discounts. In such a situation of uncertainty, the court found it inappropriate to let the garnishing order stand.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.