I do not consider either the trilogy cases or Lan v. Wu, supra, to require damages to be calculated in accordance with actuarial principles. The former, of course, were all cases where there had been devastating injuries and there was no likelihood of any future earnings which could make a "spread" unreliable. Lan v. Wu, on the other hand, was an appellate response to the judgment under appeal which had been calculated in that way.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.