Is there an error of principle in awarding damages in a personal injury case?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Rankin v. National Harbours Board, 1981 CanLII 468 (BC CA):

I have reached that opinion, and having done so, I must conclude that there has been an error of principle on the part of the trial judge within the meaning of the often quoted passage in Nance v. B.C. Elec. Ry., 1951 CanLII 374 (UK JCPC), [1951] A.C. 601, 2 W.W.R. (N.S.) 665, [1951] 3 D.L.R. 705. I am, therefore, required to reconsider the question of the award of damages.

Other Questions


In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for personal injury awarded in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for challenging an award in a personal injury case where damages are awarded on the basis that it is inordinately high or inordinately low? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles governing an award of non-pecuniary damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for challenging an award for damages awarded by a jury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any error in awarding excessive damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating damages for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles governing awards of non-pecuniary damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining the quantum of compensatory damages awarded by the Court of Appeal in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.