What is the test of sufficient cause for the issuance of a writ of summary judgment in a personal injury case?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Akitt v. McColl, 2002 BCSC 1086 (CanLII):
As discussed by Holmes J. in Schmidt v. Faryna (1994), B.C.J. No. 617 in somewhat different circumstances. . . . the test of sufficient cause has not been met here as the issuance of the writ in the circumstances could reasonably have awaited until it was known the plaintiff’s recovery was complete.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury case, in what circumstances will the BCSC provide advice to the parties on organization and preparation of the personal injury trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating damages for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a claim for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to hear personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
In making a determinate order on a motion of no confidence in a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case, what are the reasons why such a determination is necessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Canada consider a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for personal injury awarded in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law in favour of the Court of Appeal in the case of the Supreme Court of Canada's most senior judge in the matter of personal injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
