What is the test for new evidence in the context of criminal appeals?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Vlug (Re), 2018 LSBC 27 (CanLII):

The test for the admissibility of fresh evidence in the context of criminal appeals is set out in Palmer v. The Queen, 1979 CanLII 8 (SCC), [1980] 1 SCR 759: 1. The evidence should generally not be admitted if, by due diligence, it could have been adduced at trial; 2. The evidence must be relevant in the sense that it bears upon a decisive or potentially decisive issue in the trial; 3. The evidence must be credible in the sense that it is reasonably capable of belief, and 4. It must be such that, if believed, it could reasonably, when taken with the other evidence adduced at trial, be expected to have affected the result.

Other Questions


What is new evidence in the context of an appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an appeal be dismissed as abandoned on the grounds that the order appealed from was interlocutory and leave to appeal had not been obtained? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for admitting fresh evidence at the Court of Appeal of Appeal in a sexual assault case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a decision of appeal from a master be appealed from the Court of Appeal of the Master? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts considered opinion evidence in the context of an appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What evidence has been tendered to the Court of Appeal in the context of a property owner's claim for damages arising from the construction of a neighbouring lot? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the general principle of exclusion in the context of disposition evidence in criminal cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review under s. 59(1) of the Rules of Appeal Court of Appeal for a motion of appeal against the decision of a judge on a question of mixed fact and law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for allowing evidence of legislative papers to be introduced into evidence on appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has section 5 of the Rules of Appeal been interpreted in the context of an application for leave to appeal a decision refusing to grant a stay? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.