Plaintiff’s counsel relied upon a number of authorities, the first of which was Fisher v. The Queen (1961), 1961 CanLII 10 (SCC), 35 C.R. 107 (S.C.R.). That was a case where a physician was allowed to express an opinion on the capacity of the accused to form the intent required for murder in circumstances where it was admitted the accused had consumed a large quantity of beer. It was said that the evidence in question could have been given by a layman and that opinion evidence was not required but the evidence was held admissible. With respect, I do not think that case helps the determination of this appeal.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.