28 Reasons do not need to be perfect, nor need they be long. As stated by Stratas J.A. in Vancouver International Airport Authority v. P.S.A.C., 2010 FCA 158, 320 D.L.R. (4th) 733 (at para. 17): …. (b) The adequacy of reasons is not measured by the pound. The task is not to count the number of words or weigh the amount of ink spilled on the page. Instead, the task is to ask whether reasons, with an eye to their context and the evidentiary record, satisfy, in a minimal way, [their] fundamental purposes .... ….
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.